Thursday, January 14, 2010

A word on compassion

All the world's religions talk about compassion. We usually think of compassion as altruistic action: donating money to a charity, proudly brandishing a "find the cure" ribbon on the car, maybe volunteering once a week at a soup kitchen. We're told that good people are selfless people. As a privileged, self-indulgent, generally lazy American, I've often been puzzled at my own disinterest in participating in any of these kinds of activities. Shouldn't I be absolving my guilt somehow, finding a way to cope with the crushing sense of shame that comes with being born in the richest country in the world, full of luxury and unearned advantages? I mean, I don't even usually give bums money on the street. Am I too self-absorbed to give a damn about the poverty and injustice that plagues so much of the world? The short answer is yes.

Let's take a closer look at compassion. Many people, when asked why they volunteer or protest or whatever else, will say that it makes them feel that they are doing good. It makes them feel good. About themselves. Whether it is liberal guilt or compassion for compassion's sake that serves as motivation, these actions are sometimes nothing more than self-absorption cloaked in the cherished idea of "selflessness." And the more defensive you get about that assertion, brash as it may seem, the more likely it is that it hits home.

But what's so wrong with being self-centered?

Okay, so arrogance and self-absorption in others irritate us. But the kind of self-centeredness, more rightfully called self-orientedness, I'm talking about actually intimately relates to the virtue of compassion. Traditionally, ego and compassion are like the two relatives who can't be in a room together without arguing. They just don't get along. But in order to be compassionate, we have to pay attention to ourselves first.

Meditation opens up the portal of self-awareness; when perfected, the technique draws the curtain on all our ego's machinations and brings them into full light. We become acutely aware of moods and their influence instead of being ruled by them. Instead of hitching onto a thought like a runaway on a train, we take a step back and simply observe it passing like a cloud in the sky. The goal of meditation is observation without judgment, and because we get to know ourselves better in the process, it is the first step to becoming compassionate.

I remember when I first started meditating, what I found disturbed and shocked me. Did I really talk to myself that way?! It was almost comical, witnessing how I would berate myself for petty things like spending money on shoes instead of saving it, for eating that extra slice of pizza, for smoking a whole pack of cigarettes in a day. Life is full of "shoulds" and "shouldn'ts," and humans are pretty good at generating a whole lot of useless guilt over not adhering to their own personal code of "goodness." Whether it's our diets, our relationships, or our productivity, we just don't do enough, we don't measure up. We are not good enough. Everyone has felt self-loathing at some point in their lives, and for many of us, it eats away at us in subtle ways. Why did I just snap at my mom? I can't believe I'm feeling jealous over that girl that works with my boyfriend. I should strive to be better. This familiar dialogue runs unsolicited through our heads, taking on different disguises, but underneath lies the same demon: self-criticism.

And that demon is an ugly one. The cliche that you can't love others before you love yourself is the truth. We all have skeletons in our closets, and unless we air them out, they're going to rot away and make everything stink. But once you look them in the face, you realize they're not so hideous after all. When we talk about our jealousy, our indulgence of choice, or our guilt with others, that commiseration brings love. We don't think of our friends as terrible people for occasionally screwing up, so shouldn't we go a little easier on ourselves? I should add in as a caveat here to not let self-criticism become just another demon to exorcise: it's okay that you feel it. When we meditate, we don't seek to detach from or escape emotions, as some common misinterpretations lead you to believe. Feel its wrath completely and fully, and let yourself know it's okay to make mistakes. And it's okay to torture yourself for it afterwards, too. Try to see the humor in the absurdity of the whole process.

Ultimately, when we cultivate this undiscriminating acceptance in ourselves, it lends itself effortlessly to compassion for others. When we allow ourselves the space we need to air out all of the parts of ourselves we loathe, instead of repressing and covering up, it naturally follows that we become more empathetic individuals. Kindness to ourselves breeds kindness for others.

So if you're an activist or a volunteer or a "do-gooder," it's not that I'm dismissing you as an egotist. I don't think we should all become hermits and do nothing but meditate and become enlightened before real change can take place. Miracles happen all the time, and altruism has achieved some great things in the world. But let's not forget ourselves, fragile and delicate and absurd as we are, along the way.

"Love your neighbor as yourself."
-J-dawg

9 comments:

  1. Altruism itself is a selfish concept. Everything you do is for your own benefit. People are altruistic because it makes them feel good. Some people just happen to derive great happiness and value through helping others--doesn't diminish themselves in the equation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well written as always and good thoughts... Have you been reading Nietzsche? He does a lot of critiquing on altruism too. I started the "Myth of Freedom" last night and it really helped me to read what you wrote here because it makes that book more clear.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yeah, that is a good point, Rob. Like I say at the end, I'm not trying to criticize altruism, just point out that sometimes maybe people fool themselves into thinking it's unselfish and ironically give themselves an ego-boost in the process. Which there's nothing wrong with, I suppose.

    Thanks, Matt. I started that Nietzsche lecture awhile ago but never finished, I should get back to it. Myth of Freedom was a bit over my head at some parts, but overall I think it has a great message.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As I understand it, altruism is selfless action. I believe it exists. To call altruism selfish is a misunderstanding of the concept, I believe.

    Being as self absorbed as we are, I think it can be hard for us to relate to altruism.

    Whether or not one believes in altruism comes down to whether one believes we are purely selfish by nature, or if we have the potential to love as well.

    Love may seem like a big term to bring into this, but I equate it with altruism, selflessness, and compassion. Four terms for one thing, one happening.

    --

    Amy, this is a beautiful reflection on compassion. This blog is a great vehicle for one of your many gifts. Keep it up.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Furthermore...

    I'm questioning to what degree my previous post was altruistic, loving etc. To what degree was it aggressive?

    I was defending the idea that we have the potential to be selfless, and sought a subtle ego boost in doing so. Then I beat myself up a bit for it. Feeling shitty, it is likely that I will act out in some way to try to regain my sense of "goodness". Maybe this post is that act. So goes the absurdity.

    What is the point of commenting on a blog? What is the point of doing anything?

    Maybe sometimes we do stuff in order to build up some idea we have about ourselves. We want others to view us a certain way. We want to view ourselves a certain way. We want this because we believe it will bring us happiness.

    This approach to happiness is related to the Buddha's first noble truth. The truth of suffering.

    We'll never achieve happiness in this way- trying to bring about "favorable" conditions (admiration from a peer, for example). In fact, this approach to happiness is the cause of our suffering.

    Wanting certain conditions to arise is a form of suffering. The conditions arising is a form of suffering because it's related to... the passing of these conditions, which is another form of suffering.

    Round and round...

    I think that my previous post was a bit aggressive and it was directed toward rob. Sorry, dude. Old habit.

    One-upping is not the point here. I think the point of this is to enrich our understanding; to enrich our experience.

    Maybe my last post did that on some level. Hopefully this one does.

    Onward...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Cool read. I guess I might be apathetic but the question I always revert to on this subject is: "Is it even possible for the impetus to outweigh the final result?".

    In either scenario (i.e. pure altruism or ego-based altruism), the end result is helping people. Wether or not the altruist is deriving personal satisfaction from the act ends up being a non issue for me. For me, it ends up being a cultural bias towards selflessness. In western cultures (especially those founded on free-market capitalist principals) we are trained and taught to focus on a microcosm of events and people that effect our immediate lives. Although America has roots in small town communities and history of group action, we inherently distrust members outside of our group (which most of the time is nuclear family or close friends).

    Take in contrast a type of community that is founded on tribal/group action where children are treated as children of the group (not children of parent X or Y). In these types of communities it is natural and expected to participate and care for a larger group outside of "our" definition of a family (nuclear). People whose values and morals are derived from these types of communities are more accustom and likely to accept "outside" help without investigating the motive behind the action.

    Either way, I tend to look at altruism as a good thing in theory.

    Also, Trav and metalrob, I did not find either of your comments to be aggressive :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great comments, Chris. Who are you!?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Selfish altruism stems from a personal feeling of incompleteness. One seeks self-satisfaction and validity through altruism when one feels that their state of happiness and self-validation fluctuates with the external state of their lives. One can only seek to gain personally from altruism when one feels that they are in a current state of incompleteness.

    If, however, one finds themselves in a state of being in which they feel "complete" i.e. internally validated and happy, than the act of philanthropy and altruism becomes simply the next logical (for lack of a better word) step.

    Imagine our self-validation and happiness is a tall glass of Port. If in our daily lives we feel our glass is half-full, or one-quarter full, then we spend a great deal of time trying to fill that glass and to keep it filled. In such a case we might participate in altruistic projects and actions because we fill it will add more Port to our glass--and for a while it does.

    However, if at the end of the action we find ourselves in personal turmoil over our intent, well that is akin to vigorously shaking our full glass of port--spilling all of what we just gained, if not more, back out onto that expensive rug we call Life.

    Now, if we were to find ourselves in a constant state of "full glass" than any amount of Port (happiness, self-satisfaction) extra is just that: Extra.

    The altruist no longer acts out of a desire to satisfy a sense of incompleteness or to fill a glass that is half-empty. They simply act out of an intrinsic desire to spread the overflowing happiness that comes from a state of self-validation.

    And, yes, this all varies dramatically based on the cultural context of said altruist.

    ReplyDelete